When I decided I wanted to go to the International relations School, I was eager to build a comprehensive understanding of how the whole world functioned. Back then, my main assumption was that the international relations were willing to teach me the epistemology of Africa and Asia- because I always have been passionate about my african roots. Unfortunatelly I discovered that International affairs is about a western field of studies, and the scholars are totally eurocentric. So I decided to study by myself the truly international relations and build a descentrilized network of politic cience studies.
Back in 2016, when I was on a academic exchange to Italy best international jornalism school, I had a conversation with a friend about the growing scandals of violence against LGBTI people in Brazil. Even though the federal and state congresses were enacting a range of anti-discrimination laws in the past years, they were not proving themselves effective to fight homophobia – as Brazil was the country with the highest number of Trans people murders and prese. From further investigations I did later, I decided to join a group of a friends who created platforms to denounce abuse to the LGBT community, then I understood that there is no misinformation when you are the own narrator of the abuses that your community suffers.
It is clear that technology should be at the heart of human societies and institutions, however, there is still a great barrier that prevents such mindset to spread out. Although industries are being deeply transformed by tech advancements, we are still faced by the challenge of building a workforce capable of resisting change and adapting to a new environment. According to a McKinsey Global Institute Report in 2017(ref1), 800 million jobs could be lost worldwide to automation by 2030. The study says that advances in AI and robotics will have a drastic effect on everyday working lives, comparable to the shift away from agricultural societies during the Industrial Revolution. However, according to the same report, new jobs will be created; existing roles will be redefined; and workers will have the opportunity to switch careers. The challenge particular to this generation, say the authors, is managing the transition.
Therefore, the fundamental question nowadays is: in the face of technological development to areas where the human brain will no longer be necessary, what do we have left? The psychologist Daniel Goleman has given us a hint back in 1995, when he published Emotional Intelligence, which could be defined as the capacity to be aware of, control, and express one’s emotions, and to handle interpersonal relationships judiciously and empathetically.(2) Goleman always believed that emotional intelligence was critical to human development and, in today’s world, it proves to be an interesting framework to think the whole of humanity in the face of technological advancements. The Future Work Skills 2020 report published by University of Phoenix(3) Institute for the Future, abilities such as sense making, social intelligence, novel and adaptive thinking, design mindset, and cross cultural competency will be key competences in the near future. And those skills are closely associated with the development of our emotional intelligence – and it is not by chance. Technological development challenges our capacity to go back to what makes us human: our social and emotional nature.
Even though those evidences show the importance of socioemotional skills in order to help human engagement with technology, we do not have a definitive answer on how professionals in each industry will have to learn in order to adapt technological pressures. On the other hand, they offer a very clear horizon: entrepreneurial and creative minds will be needed to design what our future will look like.
We can not enclosed some exemples of autonomy perspectives changing the status quo of the inconvenient realities. In the 20th Century the technological revolution came accompanied by the computerization of the media and social networks, and with globalization the modern world became more and more compact. This phenomenon has made it possible to solve all of our problems with technology in the palms of our hands, with smartphones, for example. The challenges of our technological generation is to transfer our capacities and to make our problems on the macro sphere as easy to solve as the ones on our smartphones. In addition to that, Social media has become placed where we can discuss our demands and solution for a harmonious life in society.
The Arab Spring is a very good example of how social media has a huge impact on the consolidation and dissemination of popular demands. Arab citizens used hashtags on Twitter to spread their democratic ideals and to organize themselves against political and socioeconomic abuse committed against them for so many years. It is also observed that digital collaborative platforms are used to report abuse and human rights violations. In Rio de Janeiro, for example, apps such as “DEFEZAP” and “Fogo Cruzado” help broaden the debate on public security, making it possible that the population of the peripheral parts of the city can have their voices heard in face of the negligence of the government. These digital platforms are primordial in the lives of these people who live in areas of risk, almost substituting the current inefficient public policies for these groups. The role of social media in society should be in the consolidation of our general interests and demands. A “Technological Spring” should be practical and not only digital.
Platforms online should act for the true collective interest, as to become a tool in ending social injustice and inequality, even though we know that the media does not work that way. The task that my generation arose is to raise a new wave defeding the autonomy ofinformation, because the big media can not afford our main demands, and that was the way that we found to boicot the biased information.